| 5,464 | 10 | 333 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
语文是具有复合功能的学科教育,《义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版)》提出语文的四大核心素养:文化自信、语言运用、思维能力和审美创造,除“语言运用”对应“工具性”之外,语文课程还蕴含着科学性、人文性和艺术性这三种属性。对思维能力的培养属于科学性的范畴,文化自信是人文性的体现,而审美创造则属于感性活动,是艺术领域,语文的三维属性都与语言密不可分,且共同对塑造完整的人格发挥各自的作用。在人工智能大发展的今天,反思学科教育的本质属性显得格外重要。
Abstract:Chinese language is a subject education with complex functions. Chinese Language Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education(2022 Edition) proposes the four core competencies of Chinese language: cultural confidence,linguistic performance, thinking ability and aesthetic creation. Apart from the correspondence between “language use” and “instrumentality”,Chinese language courses also contain three attributes: scientificity, Humanism, and artistry. The cultivation of thinking ability belongs to the category of scientificity, cultural confidence is a reflection of humanism, and aesthetic creation belongs to emotional activities and the field of art. The three-dimensional properties of Chinese language are inseparable from language and play their respective roles in shaping a complete person. In the era of rapid development of artificial intelligence, it is particularly important to reflect on the essential attributes of disciplinary education.
[1]李刚.语文百年:呼唤语文教育理论:兼谈《语文课程标准》的定位[J].咸宁学院学报,2005(1).
[2]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版)[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2022.
[3]钱学森.关于思维科学[M].上海:上海人民出版社1986.
[4]王本华.张志公论语文·集外集[M].北京:语文出版社,1998.
[5]孟宪范.张志公语文教学论集[M].福州:福建教育出版社,1985.
[6]石中英.教育哲学导论[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004.
[7]潘庆玉.语文教育传统的本体论哲学批评[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007(5).
[8]《教育哲学》编写组.教育哲学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2019.
[9]倪文锦.语文教材编制的本质是选择文化[J].语文教学通讯B刊,2009(1).
[10]任志锋.价值观教育国际比较的立场、范式与难题:以东北师范大学“全球价值观教育调查”为例[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(2).
[11]梁启超.中国韵文里头所表现的情感[M]//汤志钧,汤仁泽,编.梁启超全集(第15集).北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.
[12]丰子恺.艺术教育[M]//陈星总主编.丰子恺全集(艺术理论艺术杂著卷十一).北京:海豚出版社,2016.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G633.3
引用信息:
[1]施晓风,杨玉华.语文核心素养基于课程三维属性的探讨——对《义务教育语文课程标准(2022年版)》的解读[J].齐鲁师范学院学报,2024,39(01):57-63.